|Statement||Frans Boudewijn Verwaijen.|
|LC Classifications||KNX469 .V47 1996|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||iv, 373 p. ;|
|Number of Pages||373|
|LC Control Number||2008459954|
In this rich and absorbing analysis of the transformation of political thought in nineteenth-century Japan, Douglas Howland examines the transmission to Japan of key concepts--liberty, rights, sovereignty, and society--from Western Europe and the United States. Because Western political concepts did not translate well into their language, Japanese had to invent terminology to engage Western 5/5(1). 29) Cf. F. B. Verwaijen, Early r eception of Western le gal thought in Japan, (s. l. ), who highlights the substantial Dutch influence on Japanese le gal thought in the decades. Legal Imperialism examines the important role of nineteenth-century Western extraterritorial courts in non-Western states. These courts, created as a separate legal system for Western expatriates living in Asian and Islamic coutries, developed from the British imperial model, which was founded on ideals of legal positivism. Based on a cross-cultural comparison of the emergence, . Conference: Centre for Legal History/Asian Studies 20 June Lee and Elder Rooms, Old College, 9 am – 5 pm. Attendance is free, but spaces are limited, please email Hiromi Sasamoto-Collins to secure a place.. Japanese law is said to have undergone drastic change through the adaptation of Western law in the second half of the nineteenth century.
Abstract. Ever since the opening of the country by an American squadron in –4 and the subsequent modernization process during the Meiji era, historians and social scientists have been searching for a grand theory that helps to explain why — among Asian countries — it was Japan first (and for a long time Japan alone) that was able to follow in the footsteps of Western capitalism. In the s U.S. Commodore Matthew C. Perry landed his ships in Japan and set about ending the Tokugawa shogunate’s two hundred years of self-imposed seclusion. Japanese ports opened up to England, France, Russia, Holland, and the United States. But Japan was no melting pot. In Japan, the practice was discontinued in as part of an effort to “civilize” the penal code in accord with the preferences of treaty-port powers. Some Japanese critics thought bringing it back in Taiwan was tantamount to civilizational backsliding; others worried it would brutalize the floggers and flogged alike. Japan defeats China, long the preeminent power in East Asia, in the Sino-Japanese War of over influence in the Korean peninsula. Japan defeats Russia, a major Western power, in the Russo-Japanese War of over rights in Manchuria and Korea.
This Handbook represents a big step towards a global history of international law. First, it notes that the Eurocentric story of international law is incomplete since it ignores the violence, ruthlessness, and arrogance which accompanied the dissemination of Western rules, and the destruction of other legal cultures which that dissemination caused. Early attempts were made by King William the Second of Holland to establish negotiations by sending a letter to the show gun of Japan in advising him that keeping this ban in place would affect the economic and cultural advancement of the country due to the astounding increase in agricultural, technological, and industrial advancements. "The first part of the book traces the early cultural relations between Europe and Asia. Against this historical background the second part shows how Japan reacted to Western influence from the days of her first contact with Europeans down to the time of her /5(2). This is the first systematic analysis of the early introduction and reception of international law as a Western political and legal science in China. International law in late imperial China is studied both as part of the introduction of the Western sciences and as a theoretical orientation in international affairs between and